John 18:12-27: “Jesus’ Interrogation Before Annas And Caiphas / Peter’s Denials Of Jesus

By

Jim Bomkamp

Back          Bible Studies                Home Page

 

1.                  INTRO:

 

1.1.         In our last study we looked at verses 1-11 of chapter 18.

 

1.1.1.  We observed what John, as well as the other gospel writers, record for us concerning Jesus taking His disciples to the Garden of Gethsemane at the conclusion of His Upper Room Discourse (chapters 13-16) and high priestly prayer (chapter 17) for His disciples.

 

1.1.2.  We saw that because John was writing his gospel to reveal the deity and glory of Jesus Christ, rather than Jesus’ humanity, that he did not include anything concerning Jesus’ incredible struggle that the other three synoptic gospels tell us that He went through in the Garden of Gethsemane, as He was considering the reality of what He was soon to suffer in going to Calvary’s cross and experiencing the wrath of God being poured out upon Him as He pays the full debt of our sins there.

 

1.1.3.  We looked though at the details given us by the other gospels writers of the events of this night and morning, including Jesus’ struggle, and the disciples who sleep instead of praying as Jesus commanded them to do, and then suffer the consequences when they are unprepared for the conflict that occurs when Jesus is arrested.

 

1.1.4.  We concentrated also upon looking at the majestic glory of the Son of God revealed in John’s writing when the soldiers and officers come to arrest Him and He told them, “I am He,” and the whole group drew backwards and fell to the ground.

 

1.2.         In our study today, we are going to look at verses 12-27 of chapter 18.

 

1.2.1.  We will see in our study that after Jesus is arrested that Peter and another disciple follow Jesus to where He is interrogated by Annas and then Caiaphas.  After Jesus’ arrest, Peter is not following the Lord closely but at a distance and probably should not have followed Jesus at all because he wasn’t told to follow after Jesus’ arrest, but also because he runs into temptations into which he succumbs.  Peter follows Jesus to His interrogation by Annas out of loyalty to Jesus as well as curiosity as to what will happen to Jesus.

 

1.2.2.  At Jesus’ interrogation we shall see Peter fulfill Jesus’ prediction concerning him and deny that he knows Jesus three times before the cock of morning crows.  We will see how that this denial came about and what led to the denial.

 

1.2.3.  We will begin to see in this study that everything that was done to Jesus on this morning when He suffered and was crucified was done contrary to and in violation of the Law of Moses.  In this study, Annas breaks the Law of Moses concerning Jesus in several ways:  he interrogates Jesus in secret, he interrogates Jesus during the nighttime, he tries to get Jesus to incriminate Himself through his questioning, Jesus is struck during interrogation, etc.

 

1.2.4.  M.S. Mills in “The Life Of Christ,” writes the following about the illegalities performed by the Jews to Jesus on this morning, “The Jewish leadership conducted this trial at night because of their anxiety to avoid a confrontation with the masses whom they felt would support Jesus (Matt 26:5).  However, according to Jewish custom the Sanhedrin could not meet to try anyone at night, and when this body was likely to find someone subject to the death penalty, the sentencing was supposed to be delayed until the following day so that each Sanhedrin member could sleep on his decision.  Furthermore, the voting was supposed to start with the most junior member and progress through the order of seniority to the high priest, thus avoiding pressure by the opinions of a member’s seniors in an endeavor to obtain a fair, unbiased verdict.  All these rules were broken in the case of Jesus’ trials, for, now that they found Him in their hands, their objective was to get the trials over as rapidly as possible and get Him into Roman custody before the mob could free Him.  Expediency reigned supreme over both caution and justice.

 

1.2.5.  In the Bible, not all of the details in any story that is recorded are given, however one thing that is critical for the spiritual health and growth of God’s people is found, namely, not only are the successes of the heroes of the faith included but also their failures, and there is no attempt made to ever minimize those failures nor the consequences of those failures.  Here in our study today, we read the story about the great lapse of faith, commitment, and loyalty that occurred with the disciple Peter, the man whom Jesus singly picked to be the leader of His band of disciples after His death and departure. 

 

1.2.6.  Peter not only denies the Lord three times before the cock of morning crows, as Jesus predicted he would do, he was warned by Jesus at least twice beforehand that he would deny Him.  What prompted this warning by Jesus that Peter would deny Him three times was the fact that when Jesus was telling His disciples that they would all be scattered on this night that Peter declared that though all else would forsake Jesus that he would not forsake Him (Matt. 26:33-35).  In Luke 22:31-32, we see recorded yet another warning by Jesus made to Peter, Simon, Simon, behold, Satan has demanded permission to sift you like wheat; but I have prayed for you, that your faith may not fail; and you, when once you have turned again, strengthen your brothers.”

 

1.2.6.1.By the way, have you ever thought about the fact that Jesus in His intercession for us as saints prays for us even before those times when He knows that we are going to sin?

 

1.2.7.  Peter’s words were sincere when he said that though all else would forsake Jesus that he would not forsake Him, however he was boasting in his flesh.  Peter was depending upon his own will power and strength rather than in the Lord.  Peter didn’t understand himself well.

 

1.2.8.  Jesus had invested greatly in Peter and consided Peter as being one of His key apostles, as we see from Jesus’ words recorded in Matthew 16:18-19, "And I tell you, you are Peter, and on this rock I will build my Church, and the powers of death shall not prevail against it. I will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven, and whatever you bind on earth shall be bound in heaven, and whatever you loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven."

 

1.2.9.  We will try to learn as much as we can from Peter’s failure in this situation.

 

1.2.10.Peter’s failed in the area of his strength.  Peter was a zealous believer and sought to be the supreme leader of Jesus’ disciples, however he didn’t realize how weak the resolve of the flesh really is and therefore his very strength became his greatest vulnerability.  The English preacher Spurgeon once preached about Peter saying, “Perhaps the chief reason for Peter’s denial of his Lord was his confidence in himself. If Peter had felt himself to be weaker, he would really have been stronger; but, because he felt so strong in himself, therefore he proved to be weak as water, and so denied his Master.

 

1.2.11.Failure is a part of the human experience for all of us, even those who are called to be Jesus’ disciples.  Though with zeal and resoluteness we commit ourselves to be faithful and obedient to the Lord, the fact is that we are going to find ourselves failing the Lord from time to time, sometimes miserably.  The following anonymous quote reveals how even those who are most successful in this world often end up being utter failures :

 

“In 1928 a group of the world’s most successful financiers met at the Edgewater Beach Hotel in Chicago. Present were:

The president of the largest utility company.
The greatest wheat speculator.
The president of the New York Stock Exchange.
A number of the President’s Cabinet.
The greatest “bear” in Wall Street.
The president of the Bank of International Settlements.
The head of the world’s greatest monopoly.

Collectively, these tycoons controlled more wealth than there was in the United States Treasury, and for years newspapers and magazines had been printing their success stories and urging the youth of the nation to follow their examples. Twenty-five years later, let’s see what happened to these men.

The president of the largest independent steel company, Charles Schwab, lived on borrowed money the last five years of his life, and died broke.

The greatest wheat speculator, Arthur Cutten, died abroad, insolvent.

The president of the New York Stock Exchange, Richard Whitney, was imprisoned in Sing Sing.

The member of the President’s Cabinet, Albert Fall, was pardoned from prison so he could die at home.

The greatest “bear” in Wall Street, Jesse Livermore, committed suicide.

The president of the Bank of International Settlements, Leon Fraser, committed suicide.

The head of the world’s greatest monopoly, Ivar Krueger, committed suicide.”

 

1.2.12.God uses everything that happens in our life as Christians, even our failures, for His purposes and our good as Romans 8:28 promises.  In fact, it is true of people that we often learn the most from our failures.  Our failures as Christians bring a necessary and precious humility to us and enable us to empathize and encourage others when they go through failures, if we will learn from our failures, as the following quote from Barrie Doyle reveals :

 

“When the Washington Redskins trounced Dallas for the conference championship, millions of football fans saw the team kneel in the dressing room after the game and pray. When Washington lost the Super Bowl to Miami, no cameras were on hand but the team again prayed.

 

“Following the Super Bowl defeat,” said Skinner, “team members, while disappointed, nevertheless listened while he expounded a theology of defeat.”

 

“The country and the church,” he said later, “are success-oriented and are interested only in success stories of businessmen, athletes and beauty queens. Perhaps God has a message through the guy who fumbles four times and loses the game,” Skinner said, “because we learn from our mistakes and failures.””

 

1.2.13.The failure of Peter when he denies knowing Jesus three times has brought a great amount of comfort to Christians down through the ages who also have fallen into sin.

 

1.2.14.There are some things that we as Christians need to realize concerning our failures:

 

1.2.14.1.The scripture is clear that it is inevitable that there are going to be times when even the best of God’s people are going to sin (see Romans 7; 1 John 1:8-10; 2:1-2, for instance).

 

1.2.14.2.God does not tempt us to sin, but rather sin comes from within our own sinful nature and lusts:  James 1:13-15, “13 Let no one say when he is tempted, “I am being tempted by God”; for God cannot be tempted by evil, and He Himself does not tempt anyone. 14 But each one is tempted when he is carried away and enticed by his own lust. 15 Then when lust has conceived, it gives birth to sin; and when sin is accomplished, it brings forth death.”

 

1.2.14.3.If we sin we can blame only ourselves (see James 1:13-15 above and also 1 Cor. 10:13).

 

1.2.14.4.Pride is at the heart of sin, this is especially so in the case of willful deliberate sin. 

 

1.2.14.5.The scripture shows us that God uses the failure in our lives as His people for good and helps us when we do fall to get up and to continue walking with the Lord, like Peter did when we realize that we have fallen into sin :

 

1.2.14.5.1.Psalm 37:23-24, “23 The steps of a man are established by the Lord, And He delights in his way. 24 When he falls, he will not be hurled headlong, Because the Lord is the One who holds his hand.” 

 

1.2.14.5.2.Psalm 145:14, “14 The Lord sustains all who fall And raises up all who are bowed down.” 

 

1.2.14.5.3.Proverbs 24:16, “16 For a righteous man falls seven times, and rises again, But the wicked stumble in time of calamity.” 

 

1.2.14.5.4.Proverbs 29:23, “23 A man’s pride will bring him low, But a humble spirit will obtain honor.” 

 

1.2.14.5.5.James 4:65, “17 Therefore, to one who knows the right thing to do and does not do it, to him it is sin.”

 

1.2.14.6.Though God forgives us of our sin whenever we come to Him in repentance asking for His pardon and cleansing, we still will have to suffer the natural consequences for our sin (Colossians 3:25, “25 For he who does wrong will receive the consequences of the wrong which he has done, and that without partiality.”)

 

1.2.14.6.1.God forgave and removed the guilt from David from his sin of adultery and murder nevertheless he suffered horrible and painful consequences for those sins.  His baby son, from the illicit affair with Bathsheba, died (2 Samuel 12:14), and David’s house was constantly filled with violence (2 Samuel 12:10-12).

 

1.2.14.7.Though we fall into sin as Christians, just as happened with Peter, God will use us again after we have repented and gone through the process of being restored by the Lord.

 

2.                 VS 18:12-13 - So the Roman cohort and the commander, and the officers of the Jews, arrested Jesus and bound Him, and led Him to Annas first;  for he was the father-in-law of Caiaphas, who was high priest that year. -  John tells us that the Roman cohort, commander, and officers of the Jews arrested Jesus and bound Him and led Him first to Annas, the father-in-law of the high priest, Caiphas

 

2.1.         Jesus was arrested and bound by the cohort of Roman soldiers, and they brought Him first to Annas.  John alone mentions that Jesus was brought before Annas first and then taken to Caiaphas, the other gospels only mention that Jesus was brought before Caiaphas the son in law of Annas. 

 

2.2.         Luke mentions in his gospel that there were two high priests, Annas and Caiaphas.  The Romans chose the high priest for Israel each year, however the Jews considered that a high priest was a high priest for life.  It appears that Annas was the legally accepted high priest to the Jews, however the Romans considered that Caiaphas was the high priest.   

 

2.3.         One thing that causes some confusion in reconciling the various gospel accounts is that one of John’s accounts of Peter’s denials occur while appearing before Annas, while the other writers say that all of the denials occurred before Caiaphas.  However, if Caiaphas had been present when Annas questioned Jesus we could account for this discrepancy. 

 

2.4.         As we read John’s gospel we are sure to realize that even though John doesn’t call himself by name, however he does refer to a disciple whom Jesus loved and this is believed to mean that John was speaking of himself.  However, here John simply refers to an unnamed disciple, yet many think that he still must have been referring to himself.  Arthur Pink however gives a good argument for why this unnamed disciple could not have been John himself, stating, “whoever he may have been, it is almost certain that he was not John.  In the first place, John was a poor fisherman of Galilee—far removed from Jerusalem—therefore it is most unlikely that he was on sufficiently intimate terms with the high priest as to enter his house, and have authority over the door-keeper so as to order her to admit Peter.  In the second place, John, being a Galilean, would have been recognized and challenged as was Peter (Matt. 26:69, 73).  In the third place, whenever John refers to himself in his Gospel it is always ‘the disciple whom Jesus loved  (13:23; 19:26; 20:2; 21:7, 20).  Finally, Acts 4:13 makes it very plain that the high priest was not personally acquainted with either Peter or John!  Who then was this “other disciple” ?  The answer is, We do not know.  It may have been Nicodemus or Joseph of Arimathea, but we cannot be sure.”

 

3.                 VS 18:14  - Now Caiaphas was the one who had advised the Jews that it was expedient for one man to die on behalf of the people. -  John tells us that Caiaphas had advised the Jews that it was expedient for one man to die on behalf of the people

 

3.1.         John includes this little footnote about Caiaphas in order that we might know beyond a shadow of a doubt of the evil and treacherousness of Caiaphas’ character as well as the character of his father-in-law, Annas.  Caiaphas at one point had told the nation’s leaders that it would be convenient if a man, namely Jesus, would die for the people in order to appease Rome and not let any disturbance caused by Jesus and His followers arouse Rome’s suspicion.  In other words, Caiaphas was willing to have an innocent man’s life be taken in order to score a few points with Rome. 

 

3.2.         Since Jesus presence also threatened the security of Caiaphas’ office as high priest, Caiaphas was thinking primarily of his own selfish interests in his statement.

 

4.                 VS 18:15-16  - And Simon Peter was following Jesus, and so was another disciple.  Now that disciple was known to the high priest, and entered with Jesus into the court of the high priest, but Peter was standing at the door outside.  So the other disciple, who was known to the high priest, went out and spoke to the doorkeeper, and brought in Peter. -  John tells us that Simon Peter was following Jesus after he was arrested, as was another disciple, one who was know to the high priest, and they went into the court of the high priest on this morning

 

4.1.         So, the unnamed disciple and Peter follow Jesus after He is arrested, and the unnamed disciple is first enabled to enter the court area where Jesus is to appear before Annas.  The reason that the unnamed disciple is enabled to go into the court area is that he personally knows the high priest. 

 

4.2.         The unnamed disciple first enters in and then realizes that Peter was left outside so he had Peter let into the room.

 

5.                 VS 18:17  - The slave-girl therefore who kept the door said to Peter, ‘You are not also one of this man’s disciples, are you?’  He said, ‘I am not’ -  A slave girl asks Peter if he is one of Jesus’ disciples and he denies that he is one of them

 

5.1.         Peter’s first denial of Jesus occurs as an unnamed disciple is letting Peter get entry into the court area where Annas is going to interrogate Jesus.  The slave girl simply asks Peter if he is one of Jesus’ disciples.  Peter denies that he is a disciple of Jesus...

 

5.2.         This slave girl should not have intimidated Peter at this time, therefore we can see that already Peter is acting upon his fear instead of his faith.

 

5.3.         At the heart of Peter’s denials is primarily fear.  He had been fearless earlier when in the company of Jesus and His disciples he took his sword out and tried to kill a slave but on only cut off his ear.  However, just as often happens with us, Peter’s testing occurs when he is alone, and he is not nearly as courageous when he is not in the pack of disciples. 

 

5.3.1.  We Christians should never let the fear of man hinder us and our testimony.  Rather, we should fear God instead of man, and what He might do with us should we rebel against Him and His will for us.

 

6.                 VS 18:18  - Now the slaves and the officers were standing there, having made a charcoal fire, for it was cold and they were warming themselves;  and Peter also was with them, standing and warming himself. -  John tells us that the slaves and officers were standing and warming themselves by a fire because it was cold outside, and Peter stood with them and warmed himself

 

6.1.         John mentions that this was a cold night when Jesus was betrayed.  Normally during this time of the year the weather was warm, however not so this night.  Perhaps the coldness was symbolic to John of the fear and dread which had befallen Jesus’ disciples on this evening, and Peter in particular.

 

6.2.         As we look at this story, we need to realize that it is never a good idea for Christians to find their warmth and comfort provided by the unbelievers of this world, because this inevitably ends in compromise for us.  Peter ends up denying His Lord as he is leaning up against this fire, and we Christians end up stumbling when we look to the people of this evil world for our strength, comfort and warmth.

 

6.3.         We as Christians need to be careful who we hang around with and the things that we do with people of this world because instead of having a positive influence on others instead they can end up having a bad influence on us, just as happened to Peter and as Paul writes about in 1 Corinthians 15:33, “33 Do not be deceived: “Bad company corrupts good morals.”  2 Corinthians 6:14 tell us that we Chritians need to be careful not to join ourselves whether in marriage or business, etc., with non-Christians, “14 Do not be bound together with unbelievers; for what partnership have righteousness and lawlessness, or what fellowship has light with darkness?”

 

7.                 VS 18:19  - The high priest therefore questioned Jesus about His disciples, and about His teaching. -  John tells us that the high priest questioned Jesus about His disciples and His teaching

 

7.1.         This wicked high priest was questioning Jesus about His doctrine and His disciples so that he might have some hard evidence in which to bring before Pilate to ask for the death penalty. 

 

7.2.         There was no sincerity or even curiosity in the motive of the high priest for these questions.  He was simply trying to get Jesus to incriminate Himself in some way so that he might have ammunition to use in court against Jesus.  However, doing this was in violation of the Law of Moses, ironically the very Law the high priest thought that he was protecting.

 

8.                 VS 18:20-21  - Jesus answered him, ‘I have spoken openly to the world;  I always taught in synagogues, and in the temple, where all the Jews come together;  and I spoke nothing in secret.  Why do you question me?  Question those who have heard what I spoke to them;  behold, these know what I said’ -  Jesus tells the high priest that He has spoken openly and in the synagogue and temple, and then asks him why he was questioning Him now, rather he ought to question those who have heard the things that he had spoken

 

8.1.         Jesus responds to Annas questions in righteous anger as He is aware of the man’s evil and treacherous motives.  Jesus in essence tells Annas that he is not going to get any incriminating evidence from Him secretly, for none exists.

 

8.2.         When Jesus speaks of His having spoken the things that He said ‘openly’ and ‘to the world’ he is pointing out that His interrogation and arrest was illegal and being done secretly so that what was done would not be of public knowledge.

 

8.3.         In order for charges deserving death to be brought against Jesus they will have to be completely fabricated.  Jesus is sinless and has never transgressed the Law of Moses, even though He has condemned the Pharisees’ abuse of their religious authority as Jehovah’s representatives on earth.

 

9.                 VS 18:22  - And when He had said this, one of the officers standing by gave Jesus a blow, saying, ‘Is that the way You answer the high priest?’ -  When Jesus responded this way to the high priest one of the officers standing there hit Jesus and asked him if this is the way that You answer the high priest

 

9.1.         This verse is the beginning of the chronicle that John gives us for the beating and abuse that Jesus endured on this morning as He is now beginning to suffer the punishment for our sins which each of us is due.

 

9.2.         An officer standing by as Annas is interrogating Jesus reacts to the anger in Jesus’ voice and statement to Annas and gives him a blow either with a fist, instrument or weapon of some kind. 

 

9.3.         This action of the officer hitting Jesus indiscriminately during interrogation shows the utter disregard which the Jewish leaders had for justice and how they profaned Jehovah in every aspect of their religion and personal lives.

 

10.            VS 18:23  - Jesus answered him, ‘If I have spoken wrongly, bear witness of the wrong;  but if rightly, why do you strike Me?’ -  Jesus answers the man saying that if He has spoken wrongly then tell what was wrong about what He said, but if He spoke rightly then why did he strike Him?

 

10.1.    Jesus rebukes the officer who gave Him the blow by telling him that if He has said something wrong then the officer ought to testify as to what sinful thing He might have said, but if He has simply said what is ‘truth,’ then why did the man strike Him? 

 

10.2.    Jesus rebukes the man not only for unjustly striking Him, but also for his lack of regard for the ‘truth.’

 

11.            VS 18:24  - Annas therefore sent Him bound to Caiaphas the high priest. -  Annas sends Jesus bound to Caiaphas, the high priest

 

11.1.    Having completed his interrogation of Jesus, Annas now sends Jesus to Caiaphas, for him to perform his own interrogation of Jesus and officiate in the matter.

 

11.2.    Annas the previous high priest and father-in-law of Caiaphas sends Jesus to Caiphas, the acting high priest.

 

11.3.    Notice here that Jesus had to be ‘bound’ in chains  so that He could set us captives free from our chains of sin.

 

12.            VS 18:25  - Now Simon Peter was standing and warming himself.  They said therefore to him, ‘You are not also one of His disciples, are you?’  He denied it, and said, I am not’.  One of the slaves of the high priest, being a relative of the one whose ear Peter cut off, said, ‘Did I not see you in the garden with Him?’  Peter therefore denied it again;  and immediately a cock crowed. -  Simon Peter denies know Jesus two more times and then the cock of morning crows

 

12.1.    John does not include that after his third denial of Jesus that Peter began to cuss and swear as Matthew’s  gospel does. 

 

12.2.    John’s gospel also does not include as Luke’s gospel does that Jesus looked at Peter after the cock crowed, reminding him of what He had told him would happen. Luke adds, "The Lord turned around and looked at PeterPeter went outside, weeping bitterly," (Lk.22:61).  You can be sure that Jesus’ "look" at Peter was filled with love for him.

 

12.3.    John also does not include Peter weeping bitter tears of guilty remorse after Jesus looked at him, as Luke’s gospel tells us. 

 

12.4.    The Bible Exposition Commentary tells us the following about what Matthew records in his gospel about Peter cursing during this third and final denial of Jesus, “At that point, Peter’s resistance broke down completely. He began to “curse and swear” (Matt. 26:74). This does not mean that Peter let loose a volley of blasphemies, but rather that he put himself under a curse in order to emphasize his statement. He was on trial, so he put himself under an oath to convince his accusers that he was telling the truth.”

 

12.5.    The Bible Exposition Commentary tells us the following about the cock crowing after Peter’s denials, “The crowing of the cock was assurance to Peter that Jesus was totally in control of the situation, even though He was bound and being harassed by the authorities. By controlling one bird, Jesus affirmed His sovereignty. According to Genesis 1:26, God gave man authority over the fish, the fowl, and the animals. Peter had seen Jesus exercise authority over the fish (Matt. 17:24–27; Luke 5:1–11) and the animals (Matt. 21:1–11); but now he recognized His authority over the birds. But the cockcrowing was also an invitation to repentance. “When thou art converted, strengthen thy brethren” (Luke 22:32).

 

12.6.    If we Christians, like Peter, conform ourselves to the world instead of letting the Lord conform us after His own image, there will be a progression in our lives.  A person does not suddenly fall into sin, there was a progression of actions that lead up to a fall.  Peter had not been praying as Jesus’ commanded him to do the night before so that he would not enter into temptation.  Peter would never have even thought of cursing when he first walked into the court area.  Not minutes before he had enough zeal for the Lord to get out his sword and take on the Lord’s enemies, even if his zeal was misguided.  Here after going along conforming himself to the ways of the world, he now is cursing and swearing, saying that he doesn’t even know the Lord.  One step led to another in Peter’s fall into sin on this morning.

 

12.7.    The curse words that came out of Peter’s mouth had been foreign to him for a long time, yet warming himself by the fire of his enemies had caused their influence to wear off on him.  In Eph. 4:29 the scripture tells us, “29 Let no unwholesome word proceed from your mouth, but only such a word as is good for edification according to the need of the moment, so that it will give grace to those who hear. 

 

12.8.    We Christians also never reach a plateau where we stay at a certain spiritual growth level.  We are always either growing closer to the Lord or growing further away.  We are always either growing more into the image of Christ, or we are growing more into the image of this evil and rebellious world.  We must grow in our relationship with the Lord by obedience and discipline of our life and our time, or we shall eventually grow so far from the Lord that we shall fall away for ever. 

 

12.9.    The Lord knew all along that Peter would fall, and that He had first prayed for him that he would recover and even then strengthen his brethren.  God knows our weaknesses and when and how we are going to fall, yet He does not give up on us.  After we have fallen, He still picks us up and uses us after all for His purpose.  We need to be encouraged to always fall forward and not fall away from the Lord when we do fall.

 

12.10.We Christians need to realize how weak we really are!  We need to look to the Lord moment by moment for the strength to obey Him and be used by Him.  We can so easily say at one moment as did Peter that though all else fall away, we will never fall away, then mere hours later deny the Lord and be backslidden as was Peter.  Paul said that if we think we stand, we need to take heed lest we fall. 

 

12.11.Spurgeon once preached about how that Peter was lucky that Jesus did not treat him as he treated Jesus, “What a mercy it was that Christ did not treat Peter as Peter treated him! Peter said, “I know not the man.” Ah, me! but if the blessed, meek, and lowly One had said, “I know not the man,” it would have been all. over with Peter.  May God grant that Christ may not say of any one of us, at the last great day, “I know not the man”! He will say it of all who know him not, and whom he does not know; they are not acquainted with one another, and if they continue as they are, he will say, “Verily, I say unto you, I know you not.” Though he has eaten and drunk in your presence, and taught in your streets, yet will he say, “I know you not. Depart from me, ye workers of iniquity.”  The mercy is, that he never said that to Peter; and he never will say that to you, or to me, if we come and cast ourselves in penitence at his feet, bemoaning our sin, and putting our trust in him alone.”

 

13.            CONCLUSIONS:

 

13.1.    In conclusion, we as Christians need to realize that we will not always be on the mountain top with the Lord.  As Jesus told Peter, sometimes Satan will obtain permission to sift us like wheat.  Be prepared for those times of failure before they come: 

 

13.1.1.Realize that God is allowing those times to happen (Satan has obtained permission) in order to work good out of them (Rom. 8:28).

 

13.1.2.Know that He has been and is praying for you also in your struggle so that you will overcome. 

 

13.1.3.Realize that even if you fail, God can still get glory and victory in your lives and use you again for His purposes. 

 

13.1.4.Realize that you need to look completely to Christ and His strength to get through those times. 

 

13.1.5.The Body of Christ is here to pray for you, encourage you, and exhort you in your times of failure.  Draw close to the Body and never let hyour failures pull you away from the Body.  That mistake can be fatal to your walk!

 

Back          Bible Studies                Home Page